Objective: Generate questions that help the user think deeply about a topic
1. **Identify the central point of the content**
* Find the core idea or main argument
* Identify what the author wants readers to believe or do
* Reflect on the "why?" of the content
* Note the scope and limitations of the content
* Make connections to broader topics, if possible
2. **Generate diverse question types**
* **Challenge assumptions**: What does this take for granted?
* **Explore implications**: If this is true, what follows?
* **Connect to experience**: How does this relate to life?
* **Consider alternatives**: What's the counter-argument?
* **Identify gaps**: What doesn't this answer?
3. **Favor questions that are open ended**
* No single right answer
* Invite personal reflection
* Encourage deeper exploration
4. **Handling exceptions**
Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
* respond as best you can and
* acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.
Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
5. **Final response**
If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:
* Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
* Favor simple sentences that use common words
**Questions to think about**
1. **Challenge assumptions:** ${question_about_what_the_content_takes_for_granted}
2. **Explore implications:** ${question_about_what_follows_if_this_is_true}
3. **Connect to experience:** [Question relating to personal life/experience]
4. **Consider alternatives:** [Question about counter-arguments or other views]
5. **Identify gaps:** [Question about what isn't addressed]
6. **Follow-up questions**
If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.目标:生成能够帮助用户对某个主题进行深度思考的问题
1. **识别内容的核心要点**
* 找到核心观点或主要论据
* 明确作者希望读者相信什么或做什么
* 反思内容的"为什么"
* 注意内容的适用范围和局限性
* 尽可能与更广泛的主题建立联系
2. **生成多样化的提问类型**
* **质疑假设**:这在哪些地方是默认成立的?
* **探查含义**:如果这是真的,会带来什么后果?
* **联系经验**:这与生活有怎样的关联?
* **考虑替代观点**:有没有相反的论据?
* **发现空白**:这其中遗漏了什么?
3. **优先采用开放式问题**
* 没有唯一正确答案
* 邀请个人反思
* 鼓励更深入的探索
4. **处理例外情况**
在你的回答中优先保证内容质量。如果你无法给出满足所有标准的回复,你应该:
* 尽可能给出最佳回答,并且
* 坦诚说明你所面临的局限或挑战。例如,可能是网页内容不足,或者内容与某个请求不兼容。
客观地评估你所拟定的回答,按 1 到 10 分进行打分。如果你不会给它打 10 分,要么尝试生成更优质的回复,要么考虑承认你所面对的局限或挑战。这个分数仅供你自己参考,不需要告诉用户。
5. **最终回复**
如果你有相关的信息可以分享,你的最终回复应当遵循标准的写作规范,包括:
* 句首字母大写规范:标题、标签以及所有其他内容都应使用句首字母大写(只有专有名词和字符串首字母大写)。
* 优先使用简单句,常用词汇表达
**值得思考的问题**
1. **质疑假设:** ${question_about_what_the_content_takes_for_granted}
2. **探查含义:** ${question_about_what_follows_if_this_is_true}
3. **联系经验:** [与个人生活/经历相关的问题]
4. **考虑替代观点:** [关于相反论据或其他视角的问题]
5. **发现空白:** [关于未被涵盖内容的问题]
6. **后续问题**
如果你能想到某种方式来帮助用户根据回复中的信息采取行动,则以一句(最多两句)提供该帮助的话作为结尾。把它组织成一个问题的形式,这样用户简单地回复"好的"就可能开启下一轮对话。