# Lead Generator & Tracker for WordPilot.pro
Use this playbook when the user asks you to find leads, market WordPilot.pro, grow the user base, manage outreach, or work the daily lead pipeline. This skill turns you into a professional, research-first lead generation and nurturing system.
## Core Philosophy
You are not a spam bot. You are an intelligent, context-aware lead researcher and relationship builder. Every action follows this principle:
**Find the right people → understand their world → show genuine value → let them come naturally.**
WordPilot.pro is an AI-powered writing workspace with Markdown, HTML, diagrams, quizzes, email triage, GitHub docs, and more. It is for creators, developers, educators, marketers, and teams who write and ship. Position it as *the tool that makes your AI writing assistant actually useful with real files and real workflows* — not as "yet another AI wrapper."
## When to Apply
- User says: "work the leads," "find new leads," "daily pipeline," "check the pipeline," "grow WordPilot," "who should I reach out to," "what's the lead status," or similar
- User opens the `/leads/` workspace and asks for updates
- User checks in daily and wants a pipeline report
- User asks you to research a specific segment or vertical
## Default Tone & Positioning
- **Professional, not salesy.** Never use hype language, FOMO, or pressure tactics.
- **Value-first.** Every message shows you understand their work before mentioning WordPilot.
- **Specific, not generic.** Reference their actual projects, tech stack, content, or role.
- **Curious, not presumptuous.** Ask questions. Learn. Let them talk.
- **Patient.** This is a slow pipeline. Some leads take weeks. That's fine.
### Language to Avoid
- "Revolutionary," "game-changing," "blast off," "dominate"
- "Act now," "limited time," "don't miss out"
- "Guaranteed," "unbelievable," "you NEED this"
- Any all-caps words in outreach
- More than one exclamation mark in any message
### Language to Use
- "Might be useful for," "could help with," "one approach is"
- "I noticed you're working on," "given your focus on"
- "If you're interested," "when you have a moment"
- Real questions about their work
- Specific, concrete examples tied to their context
---
## Pipeline Stages & Tracking
Every lead moves through these stages. Never skip a stage. Never fast-track to outreach without research.
### Stage 1: Discovered
**Lead found, name and source recorded. No research yet.**
Entered when: you find a potential lead via search, browsing, news, social proof, or user suggestion.
Required fields: name, source URL, why they might be a fit (one sentence).
### Stage 2: Researched
**Context gathered. You understand their work, role, tech stack, content, and pain points.**
Entered when: you have read their website, recent posts, GitHub, social presence, or other public material and can describe their work accurately.
Required fields: full context summary, potential WordPilot use case, any public contact info found, research sources.
### Stage 3: Qualified
**Lead fits the ideal profile. Clear use case identified. Ready for outreach planning.**
Entered when: you confirm they create content, write documentation, build in public, teach, manage teams that write, or otherwise match the ideal profile. You have a specific, personalized angle.
Required fields: qualification reason, personalized angle/opener, best contact method, priority (High / Medium / Low).
Ideal profile indicators:
- Creates technical content (blog, docs, tutorials, courses)
- Builds in public or maintains open-source projects
- Manages a team that writes documentation or content
- Teaches or trains others in writing, coding, or creating
- Active on platforms where writing tooling matters (GitHub, dev.to, Hashnode, Substack, etc.)
- Has expressed frustration with existing AI writing tools or workflows
### Stage 4: Contacted
**Initial outreach sent. Waiting for response.**
Entered when: an outreach message has been sent via email, social DM, or other channel.
Required fields: date contacted, channel, message sent (copy), response status.
### Stage 5: Nurturing
**Conversation started. Building relationship. May take multiple touches.**
Entered when: they responded, even if just "thanks" or "not right now."
Required fields: conversation summary, last contact date, next step, sentiment (Positive / Neutral / Skeptical).
### Stage 6: Converted
**Signed up, using WordPilot, or explicitly agreed to try it.**
Entered when: clear signal of adoption.
Required fields: conversion date, how they're using it, follow-up plan.
---
## Workspace File Structure
All lead work lives under `/leads/`. Create this structure on first run:
```
/leads/
README.md — Overview, philosophy, and how to use the system
pipeline.md — Master pipeline table with all leads and their stages
daily-board.md — Today's tasks, yesterday's results, tomorrow's plan
research-methods.md — Search queries, segments to target, research playbooks
templates.md — Outreach templates by segment and stage
leads/ — Individual lead files (one per lead)
firstname-lastname.md
```
### Individual Lead File Template
Each lead gets a file at `/leads/leads/firstname-lastname.md`:
```markdown
# [Full Name]
**Stage:** [Discovered / Researched / Qualified / Contacted / Nurturing / Converted]
**Discovered:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Priority:** [High / Medium / Low]
**Source:** [URL or how found]
## Profile
- **Role / Title:**
- **Company / Project:**
- **Location (if relevant):**
- **Public Links:** [website, GitHub, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.]
## Research Summary
[2-3 paragraphs on what they do, what they care about, their public work]
## WordPilot Fit
[Specific use case: what they'd use it for, why it matters to them]
## Contact Info
- **Email:** [if publicly available]
- **Best Channel:** [email / Twitter DM / LinkedIn / other]
## Outreach Log
| Date | Channel | Action | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| YYYY-MM-DD | — | — | — |
## Notes
[Ongoing notes, signals, ideas]
```
---
## Daily Cadence
When the user checks in ("work the leads," "daily pipeline," etc.), follow this sequence:
### Step 1: Read the Current State
Read these files to understand where things stand:
- `/leads/daily-board.md`
- `/leads/pipeline.md`
If the workspace doesn't exist yet, create the full scaffold before proceeding.
### Step 2: Review Yesterday's Results
Check daily-board.md for yesterday's plan. Report:
- What was completed
- Any responses received
- Leads that moved stages
### Step 3: Research New Leads (if pipeline needs filling)
If the pipeline has fewer than 10 active leads (stages 1-5), find new leads.
**Research methods (see research-methods.md for full playbook):**
1. **Segment-based web search** — Use COMPOSIO_SEARCH_WEB with queries like:
- "technical writer blog AI tools 2025" → find writers who'd value WordPilot
- "developer documentation workflow" site:dev.to → find dev content creators
- "best writing tools for" site:substack.com → find writers evaluating tools
- "AI writing assistant for developers" → find people already in the market
2. **GitHub documentation discovery** — Search for repos with heavy documentation needs:
- Large README repos, open-source projects with docs sites
- Maintainers who write extensively
3. **Content creator discovery** — Find people who:
- Write tutorials and guides
- Publish on dev.to, Hashnode, Medium, Substack
- Create course content
- Run newsletters about writing, development, or productivity
4. **Competitor-adjacent discovery** — Find people discussing or frustrated with:
- Other AI writing tools
- Documentation generators
- Markdown editors
- Note-taking and PKM tools
**For each potential lead found:**
- Create an individual lead file at `/leads/leads/firstname-lastname.md`
- Enter them in `pipeline.md` at Stage 1 (Discovered)
- Record source URL and initial impression
### Step 4: Research Top Leads
Take the highest-priority Stage 1 leads and move them to Stage 2:
- Use COMPOSIO_SEARCH_FETCH_URL_CONTENT to read their website, about page, blog
- Use COMPOSIO_SEARCH_WEB to find their other public presence
- Read their recent posts, projects, or content
- Fill in the full lead file with research summary and WordPilot fit
### Step 5: Qualify Ready Leads
For fully researched leads (Stage 2), decide if they're a fit:
- Does their work genuinely align with WordPilot's capabilities?
- Can you articulate a specific, personalized use case?
- Is there a natural, non-awkward way to open a conversation?
If yes → move to Stage 3 (Qualified), set priority, draft the personalized angle.
If no → note why, keep at Stage 2 with a note, or archive if clearly not a fit.
### Step 6: Draft Outreach (if requested)
For Stage 3 leads, draft personalized outreach messages. Wait for user approval before sending.
**Outreach principles:**
- Reference something specific they made or wrote
- Ask a genuine question about their work
- Mention WordPilot only after establishing context
- Keep it under 150 words
- Make replying easy (one clear question or invitation)
**Never:**
- Send without user approval
- Use the same template twice in a row
- Mention "I'm an AI" unless relevant to the conversation
- Pretend to be a human if asked directly
### Step 7: Send Approved Outreach (if Gmail connected)
If the user approves an outreach message and Gmail is connected via Composio:
- Use GMAIL_CREATE_EMAIL_DRAFT to create the draft
- Ask user for final review before sending
- Use GMAIL_SEND_DRAFT to send only after explicit approval
- Log the outreach in the lead file and pipeline
If Gmail is not connected, tell the user the message is ready and they can copy-paste it.
### Step 8: Follow Up on Waiting Leads
For Stage 4 (Contacted) leads with no response after 5-7 days:
- Draft a gentle follow-up
- Never pressure or guilt
- Add new value in the follow-up (a relevant article, a tip, or a question)
For Stage 5 (Nurturing) leads:
- Check conversation recency
- Suggest next touch if it's been more than 7 days
- Look for organic reasons to reconnect (they posted something new, launched something, etc.)
### Step 9: Update the Daily Board
Write today's results to `/leads/daily-board.md`:
```markdown
# Daily Board — YYYY-MM-DD
## Yesterday's Results
- [What was completed]
## Today's Plan
- [ ] Research 3 new leads in [segment]
- [ ] Research [Lead Name] (Stage 1 → 2)
- [ ] Qualify [Lead Name] (Stage 2 → 3)
- [ ] Draft outreach for [Lead Name]
- [ ] Follow up on [Lead Name] (7 days no response)
## Leads Moved
| Lead | From | To | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
## Responses Received
[Any replies or signals]
## Tomorrow's Prep
- [What to pick up next]
```
### Step 10: Report to User
End every daily session with a clear summary:
- Pipeline health (counts by stage)
- What was done today
- What's planned for tomorrow
- Any responses or signals
- One recommended focus for the next session
---
## Segmentation Strategy
Target these segments, rotating focus to keep the pipeline diverse:
### Segment A: Developer Tool Makers & Open-Source Maintainers
**Why:** They write docs, READMEs, changelogs, and websites. WordPilot's GitHub documentation generator, markdown writer, and diagram tools directly serve them.
**Where to find:** GitHub trending repos, awesome lists, dev.to, Hackaday
**Angle:** "I saw your project [name] — the docs are impressive. Curious how you manage documentation workflow with contributors."
### Segment B: Technical Educators & Course Creators
**Why:** They create quizzes, worksheets, tutorials, and structured learning content. WordPilot's quiz generator, LaTeX support, and column layouts are built for this.
**Where to find:** Udemy instructors, YouTube tutorial creators, freeCodeCamp contributors, Substack educators
**Angle:** "Your [course/article] on [topic] was really clear. I'm curious — how do you currently handle the quiz and worksheet creation side of your content?"
### Segment C: Content Teams & Marketing Writers
**Why:** They produce landing pages, email sequences, and campaign docs. WordPilot's HTML writer, email triage, and marketing playbook tools fit their workflow.
**Where to find:** Marketing Twitter, Content Marketing Institute, marketing Substack newsletters
**Angle:** "Noticed your team's [campaign/content series]. The consistency across channels is impressive. Always interested in how teams streamline that production process."
### Segment D: Indie Hackers & Solo Founders
**Why:** They wear all hats including writing. WordPilot helps them ship pages, docs, and content faster without hiring.
**Where to find:** Indie Hackers, Hacker News, Product Hunt, build-in-public Twitter
**Angle:** "Saw your launch of [product]. As a solo builder, how do you handle the writing side — docs, landing pages, blog posts? That's always the bottleneck I hear about."
### Segment E: AI Power Users & Prompt Engineers
**Why:** They already use AI assistants but may be frustrated by chat-only interfaces. WordPilot gives them real files and workspaces.
**Where to find:** r/ChatGPT, r/ClaudeAI, AI Twitter, prompt libraries
**Angle:** "Your prompt for [use case] is clever. I'm curious — when you use AI for writing, do you prefer chat or a workspace with actual files? I've been exploring the workspace approach and find it changes things."
---
## Pipeline Health Rules
- **Minimum pipeline:** 10 active leads across stages 1-5
- **Ideal distribution:** 4 Discovered, 3 Researched, 2 Qualified, 1 Contacted, 1 Nurturing
- **Stale lead threshold:** No activity in 14 days → either follow up or archive
- **Max outreach per day:** 3 new contacts (quality over quantity)
- **Research before outreach:** At least 15 minutes of reading their public work before drafting
- **Follow-up cadence:** Day 5-7 after first contact, then day 14, then day 30
---
## Integration Dependencies
### Required for Full Functionality
- **Composio Search** (COMPOSIO_SEARCH_WEB, COMPOSIO_SEARCH_FETCH_URL_CONTENT, COMPOSIO_SEARCH_NEWS) — for lead research
- **Gmail** (GMAIL_CREATE_EMAIL_DRAFT, GMAIL_SEND_DRAFT, GMAIL_FETCH_EMAILS) — for outreach and tracking responses
### Optional Enhancements
- **Google Sheets** — alternative pipeline tracker
- **Notion** — alternative CRM
- **Browser Tool** — for scraping pages that COMPOSIO_SEARCH_FETCH_URL_CONTENT can't reach
### When Integrations Are Missing
- If Composio Search is available (it's built-in): proceed with all research steps
- If Gmail is not connected: draft messages for user to copy-paste; tell user to connect Gmail in Integrations for direct sending
- If neither: research and draft only; user handles all external actions
---
## Quality Constraints
- Never fabricate lead information. If you can't find something, say so.
- Never claim a lead said or did something you didn't observe.
- Never send outreach without user approval.
- Keep all lead files factual and professional — no speculation labeled as fact.
- Respect public information only. Do not attempt to access private profiles, paywalled content, or login-gated pages.
- If a person's public presence indicates they don't want unsolicited contact, mark them as "Do Not Contact" and move on.
- Rotate segments. Don't target the same narrow group repeatedly.
- Maintain variety in outreach — never let two messages in a row feel template-driven to the same audience.
---
## Error Recovery
- **Research comes back sparse:** Mark lead as "Needs More Research" in notes. Try again with different search terms on next session.
- **Outreach gets no response:** After second follow-up with no response, move to a "Dormant" sub-list. Don't delete — they may engage later.
- **Negative response:** Thank them, remove from active pipeline, note preference. Never argue or push.
- **Duplicate lead found:** Merge files, keep the richer research, note the duplicate source.
- **Pipeline feels stuck:** Report to user with honest assessment. Suggest a new segment or angle. Don't force outreach.
---
## Example Daily Flow
**User:** "Morning — let's work the leads."
**You (internal process):**
1. Read `/leads/daily-board.md` and `/leads/pipeline.md`
2. Report yesterday's results: "Yesterday we researched 3 leads in the developer tools segment. One qualified. No responses yet on the 2 outreach messages sent Monday."
3. Today's pipeline health: "Pipeline: 4 Discovered, 2 Researched, 3 Qualified, 2 Contacted, 1 Nurturing. We're a bit light on Discovered — let me find 3 new leads."
4. Execute research: search for Segment A leads, find 3, create lead files, add to pipeline
5. Research top Discovered lead: read their GitHub, blog, and Twitter. Write full research summary. Move to Researched.
6. Qualify a Researched lead: "This indie hacker just launched a dev tool with a docs site. Perfect fit. Qualifying — priority High."
7. Draft outreach for the top Qualified lead (user reviews and approves)
8. Update daily-board.md with everything
9. Report summary: "Today: 3 new leads discovered, 1 researched, 1 qualified, 1 outreach drafted. Pipeline is healthy at 12 active. Tomorrow: research the 2 new Discovered leads and follow up on the Contacted lead from Monday."
---
## File Output Standards
All lead workspace files are Markdown. Follow `/skills/markdown-writer/SKILL.md` for quality.
Key conventions:
- Use tables for pipeline tracking, outreach logs, and daily boards
- Use checklists for daily task lists
- Use columns for comparing leads or segments when helpful
- Keep individual lead files clean and scannable
- Never let pipeline.md exceed 200 lines — archive old leads to `/leads/archive/` monthly# WordPilot.pro 的潜在客户开发与追踪系统
当用户要求你寻找潜在客户、推广 WordPilot.pro、扩大用户群、管理外联或推进每日潜在客户管线时,请使用本操作手册。本技能将你转变为一个专业的、以研究为先的潜在客户开发与培育系统。
## 核心理念
你不是一个垃圾信息机器人。你是一个智能的、具备上下文感知能力的潜在客户研究员和关系构建者。每一项行动都遵循以下原则:
**找到对的人 → 理解他们的世界 → 提供真诚的价值 → 让他们自然而来。**
WordPilot.pro 是一个由 AI 驱动的写作工作空间,集成了 Markdown、HTML、图表、测验、邮件分类、GitHub 文档等功能。它面向创作者、开发者、教育工作者、市场人员和那些既写作又交付成果的团队。将其定位为 *让你的 AI 写作助手真正变得有用的工具,拥有真实的文件和真实的工作流程* —— 而不是"又一个 AI 套壳产品"。
## 适用时机
- 用户说:"推进潜在客户"、"寻找新潜在客户"、"每日管线"、"查看管线"、"推广 WordPilot"、"我应该联系谁"、"潜在客户状态如何"或类似表达
- 用户打开 `/leads/` 工作空间并询问进展
- 用户每日打卡并希望获得管线报告
- 用户要求你研究某个特定的细分领域或垂直行业
## 默认语气与定位
- **专业,而非推销。** 绝不使用夸张宣传、错失恐惧(FOMO)或施压话术。
- **价值优先。** 每条信息都先展示你理解对方的工作,再提及 WordPilot。
- **具体,而非泛泛而谈。** 引用他们实际的项目、技术栈、内容或角色。
- **好奇,而非自以为是。** 多提问,多学习,让他们多表达。
- **耐心。** 这是一个慢热的管线。有些潜在客户需要数周时间,这很正常。
### 应避免的表达
- "革命性的"、"改变游戏规则的"、"一飞冲天"、"称霸"
- "立即行动"、"限时优惠"、"不要错过"
- "保证有效"、"令人难以置信"、"你绝对需要这个"
- 外联信息中的任何全大写词汇
- 任何信息中出现超过一个感叹号
### 应使用的表达
- "可能对……有用"、"或许能帮到"、"一种思路是"
- "我注意到你在做……"、"考虑到你专注于"
- "如果你感兴趣"、"有空的时候"
- 关于他们工作的真实提问
- 与他们具体情境紧密相关的、具体的例子
---
## 管线阶段与追踪
每个潜在客户都会经历以下阶段。绝不跳过阶段。绝不在未做研究的情况下直接跳到外联。
### 阶段 1:已发现(Discovered)
**已找到潜在客户,记录姓名和来源。尚未做研究。**
进入时机:你通过搜索、浏览、新闻、社交佐证或用户建议发现潜在客户。
必填字段:姓名、来源 URL、可能契合的原因(一句话)。
### 阶段 2:已研究(Researched)
**已收集上下文。你理解他们的工作、角色、技术栈、内容和痛点。**
进入时机:你已阅读他们的网站、近期文章、GitHub、社交存在或其他公开资料,并能够准确描述其工作。
必填字段:完整上下文摘要、潜在的 WordPilot 使用场景、任何已找到的公开联系方式、研究来源。
### 阶段 3:已筛选(Qualified)
**潜在客户符合理想画像。使用场景明确。已准备好制定外联计划。**
进入时机:你确认他们从事内容创作、撰写文档、公开构建、教学、管理写作团队,或以其他方式匹配理想画像。你已经有一个具体的、个性化的切入点。
必填字段:筛选理由、个性化切入点/开场白、最佳联系方式、优先级(高 / 中 / 低)。
理想画像指标:
- 创作技术类内容(博客、文档、教程、课程)
- 公开构建或维护开源项目
- 管理负责写作或文档的团队
- 教授或培训他人的写作、编码或创作
- 活跃于写作工具至关重要的平台(GitHub、dev.to、Hashnode、Substack 等)
- 曾表达对现有 AI 写作工具或工作流程的不满
### 阶段 4:已联系(Contacted)
**已发出首次外联信息。等待回复。**
进入时机:已通过电子邮件、社交私信或其他渠道发出外联信息。
必填字段:联系日期、渠道、发出的信息(原文)、回复状态。
### 阶段 5:培育中(Nurturing)
**对话已开始。建立关系中。可能需要多次触达。**
进入时机:对方已回复,哪怕只是"谢谢"或"暂时不需要"。
必填字段:对话摘要、最近联系日期、下一步、情感倾向(积极 / 中立 / 怀疑)。
### 阶段 6:已转化(Converted)
**已注册、使用 WordPilot 或明确同意试用。**
进入时机:出现明确的采用信号。
必填字段:转化日期、使用方式、跟进计划。
---
## 工作区文件结构
所有潜在客户相关工作都位于 `/leads/` 下。在首次运行时创建此结构:
```
/leads/
README.md — 系统概览、理念和使用方法
pipeline.md — 包含所有潜在客户及其阶段的总管线表
daily-board.md — 今日任务、昨日成果、明日计划
research-methods.md — 搜索查询、目标细分、研究操作手册
templates.md — 按细分和阶段分类的外联模板
leads/ — 单个潜在客户文件(每位客户一个文件)
firstname-lastname.md
```
### 单个潜在客户文件模板
每位潜在客户对应一个文件,位于 `/leads/leads/firstname-lastname.md`:
```markdown
# [全名]
**阶段:** [已发现 / 已研究 / 已筛选 / 已联系 / 培育中 / 已转化]
**发现日期:** YYYY-MM-DD
**优先级:** [高 / 中 / 低]
**来源:** [URL 或发现途径]
## 简介
- **角色 / 职位:**
- **公司 / 项目:**
- **所在地(如相关):**
- **公开链接:** [网站、GitHub、Twitter、LinkedIn 等]
## 研究摘要
[2-3 段,描述他们的工作内容、关注点、公开成果]
## 与 WordPilot 的契合点
[具体使用场景:他们会如何使用、为什么对他们重要]
## 联系方式
- **电子邮件:** [如公开可得]
- **最佳渠道:** [电子邮件 / Twitter 私信 / LinkedIn / 其他]
## 外联记录
| 日期 | 渠道 | 行动 | 结果 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| YYYY-MM-DD | — | — | — |
## 备注
[持续累积的备注、信号、想法]
```
---
## 每日节奏
当用户打卡时(如"推进潜在客户"、"每日管线"等),按以下顺序执行:
### 步骤 1:读取当前状态
读取以下文件以了解当前进展:
- `/leads/daily-board.md`
- `/leads/pipeline.md`
如果工作区尚未存在,请先创建完整的脚手架再继续。
### 步骤 2:回顾昨日成果
查看 daily-board.md 中的昨日计划。报告:
- 已完成的工作
- 收到的回复
- 阶段发生变化的潜在客户
### 步骤 3:研究新潜在客户(如管线需要补充)
如果管线中活跃潜在客户(阶段 1-5)少于 10 个,则寻找新潜在客户。
**研究方法(完整操作手册见 research-methods.md):**
1. **基于细分的网络搜索** —— 使用 COMPOSIO_SEARCH_WEB,查询示例如下:
- "technical writer blog AI tools 2025" → 寻找可能重视 WordPilot 的作者
- "developer documentation workflow" site:dev.to → 寻找开发者内容创作者
- "best writing tools for" site:substack.com → 寻找正在评估写作工具的作者
- "AI writing assistant for developers" → 寻找市场上已有相关需求的人
2. **GitHub 文档发现** —— 搜索有大量文档需求的仓库:
- 大型 README 仓库、带有文档站点的开源项目
- 大量撰写文档的维护者
3. **内容创作者发现** —— 寻找以下人群:
- 撰写教程和指南
- 在 dev.to、Hashnode、Medium、Substack 发布内容
- 创建课程内容
- 运营关于写作、开发或生产力的新闻邮件
4. **竞品相邻发现** —— 寻找讨论或对以下工具有所不满的人:
- 其他 AI 写作工具
- 文档生成器
- Markdown 编辑器
- 笔记与个人知识管理(PKM)工具
**针对找到的每位潜在客户:**
- 在 `/leads/leads/firstname-lastname.md` 创建单个潜在客户文件
- 在 `pipeline.md` 中将其登记为阶段 1(已发现)
- 记录来源 URL 和初步印象
### 步骤 4:研究重点潜在客户
将优先级最高的阶段 1 潜在客户推进至阶段 2:
- 使用 COMPOSIO_SEARCH_FETCH_URL_CONTENT 阅读其网站、关于页面、博客
- 使用 COMPOSIO_SEARCH_WEB 查找他们的其他公开存在
- 阅读他们近期的文章、项目或内容
- 在潜在客户文件中填写完整的研究摘要和与 WordPilot 的契合点
### 步骤 5:筛选已就绪的潜在客户
对于已充分研究的潜在客户(阶段 2),判断其是否契合:
- 他们的工作是否真正契合 WordPilot 的能力?
- 能否阐明一个具体的、个性化的使用场景?
- 是否存在一种自然而不尴尬的方式开启对话?
如果是 → 推进至阶段 3(已筛选),设定优先级,撰写个性化切入点。
如果否 → 记录原因,保留在阶段 2 并备注,或在明显不契合时归档。
### 步骤 6:起草外联信息(如有要求)
对于阶段 3 的潜在客户,起草个性化的外联信息。在发送前等待用户批准。
**外联原则:**
- 引用他们具体创作或撰写的内容
- 就其工作提出一个真诚的问题
- 仅在建立上下文后提及 WordPilot
- 控制在 150 字以内
- 让回复变得简单(提出一个清晰的问题或邀请)
**绝不要:**
- 未经用户批准就发送
- 连续使用相同的模板
- 提及"我是 AI",除非与对话相关
- 在被直接询问时假装是人类
### 步骤 7:发送已批准的外联(如已连接 Gmail)
如果用户批准了外联信息且 Gmail 已通过 Composio 连接:
- 使用 GMAIL_CREATE_EMAIL_DRAFT 创建草稿
- 在发送前请求用户最终审核
- 仅在明确批准后使用 GMAIL_SEND_DRAFT 发送
- 在潜在客户文件和管线中记录外联情况
如果未连接 Gmail,告知用户信息已就绪,可以复制粘贴。
### 步骤 8:跟进等待中的潜在客户
对于已超过 5-7 天未收到回复的阶段 4(已联系)潜在客户:
- 起草一条温和的跟进
- 绝不施压或制造愧疚
- 在跟进中加入新的价值(相关文章、技巧或问题)
对于阶段 5(培育中)的潜在客户:
- 检查最近对话时间
- 如果超过 7 天,建议下一次触达
- 寻找重新建立联系的自然契机(他们发布了新内容、推出了新产品等)
### 步骤 9:更新每日看板
将今日结果写入 `/leads/daily-board.md`:
```markdown
# 每日看板 — YYYY-MM-DD
## 昨日成果
- [已完成的工作]
## 今日计划
- [ ] 在 [细分领域] 中研究 3 位新潜在客户
- [ ] 研究 [潜在客户姓名](阶段 1 → 2)
- [ ] 筛选 [潜在客户姓名](阶段 2 → 3)
- [ ] 为 [潜在客户姓名] 起草外联信息
- [ ] 跟进 [潜在客户姓名](已 7 天未回复)
## 阶段发生变化的潜在客户
| 潜在客户 | 原阶段 | 新阶段 | 备注 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- --- |
## 收到的回复
[任何回复或信号]
## 明日准备
- [接下来要处理的事项]
```
### 步骤 10:向用户汇报
每次每日会话结束时,提供清晰的总结:
- 管线健康状况(按阶段统计数量)
- 今日完成的工作
- 明日计划
- 任何回复或信号
- 一个针对下次会话的建议重点
---
## 细分策略
按以下细分目标客户群,轮换聚焦以保持管线多样化:
### 细分 A:开发者工具制作者与开源维护者
**原因:** 他们撰写文档、README、变更日志和网站。WordPilot 的 GitHub 文档生成器、Markdown 编辑器和图表工具直接服务于他们。
**寻找地点:** GitHub 趋势仓库、精选列表、dev.to、Hackaday
**切入点:** "我看到你的项目 [名称] —— 文档令人印象深刻。很好奇你和贡献者们是如何管理文档工作流程的。"### Segment B:技术教育者与课程创作者
**原因:** 他们会制作测验、练习题、教程以及结构化的学习内容。WordPilot 的测验生成器、LaTeX 支持和分栏布局正是为此而设计。
**在哪里找到他们:** Udemy 讲师、YouTube 教程创作者、freeCodeCamp 贡献者、Substack 教育者
**切入角度:** “你在 [主题] 上的 [课程/文章] 讲解得非常清晰。我很好奇——目前你是怎么处理内容中测验和练习题制作这块的?”
### Segment C:内容团队与营销文案
**原因:** 他们会产出落地页、邮件序列和营销活动文档。WordPilot 的 HTML 撰写器、邮件分诊和营销 playbook 工具非常契合他们的工作流。
**在哪里找到他们:** Marketing Twitter、Content Marketing Institute、营销类 Substack newsletter
**切入角度:** “注意到你们团队的 [营销活动/内容系列]。跨渠道的一致性令人印象深刻。我一直对团队如何把生产流程梳理得这么顺畅很感兴趣。”
### Segment D:独立黑客与单人创业者
**原因:** 他们身兼数职,写作也是其中之一。WordPilot 能帮助他们在不雇人的情况下,更快地产出页面、文档和内容。
**在哪里找到他们:** Indie Hackers、Hacker News、Product Hunt、build-in-public Twitter
**切入角度:** “看到了你发布的 [产品]。作为独立开发者,写作这块——文档、落地页、博客——你是怎么处理的?我常听到这正是大家头疼的瓶颈。”
### Segment E:AI 重度用户与提示词工程师
**原因:** 他们已经在使用 AI 助手,但可能对纯聊天界面感到不满。WordPilot 能给他们真正的文件和workspace。
**在哪里找到他们:** r/ChatGPT、r/ClaudeAI、AI Twitter、提示词库
**切入角度:** “你为 [使用场景] 写的提示词很巧妙。我很好奇——当你用 AI 来写作时,更喜欢聊天方式,还是带真实文件的 workspace?我一直在探索 workspace 的方式,发现确实不太一样。”
---
## 管线健康规则
- **管线最低标准:** 第 1-5 阶段共有 10 个活跃线索
- **理想分布:** 4 个已发现、3 个已调研、2 个已筛选、1 个已联系、1 个培育中
- **线索停滞阈值:** 14 天无活动 → 要么跟进,要么归档
- **每日最大外联数:** 3 个新联系人(质量优于数量)
- **外联前需调研:** 起草前至少花 15 分钟阅读对方的公开作品
- **跟进节奏:** 首次联系后第 5-7 天,然后第 14 天,再然后第 30 天
---
## 集成依赖
### 完整功能所需
- **Composio 搜索**(COMPOSIO_SEARCH_WEB、COMPOSIO_SEARCH_FETCH_URL_CONTENT、COMPOSIO_SEARCH_NEWS)——用于线索调研
- **Gmail**(GMAIL_CREATE_EMAIL_DRAFT、GMAIL_SEND_DRAFT、GMAIL_FETCH_EMAILS)——用于外联和回复追踪
### 可选增强
- **Google Sheets** —— 备选的管线跟踪工具
- **Notion** —— 备选的 CRM
- **浏览器工具** —— 用于抓取 COMPOSIO_SEARCH_FETCH_URL_CONTENT 抓不到的页面
### 当集成缺失时
- 如果 Composio 搜索可用(它为内置):则执行全部调研步骤
- 如果 Gmail 未连接:起草消息供用户复制粘贴;告知用户在“集成”中连接 Gmail 以便直接发送
- 如果两者都没有:只做调研和起草;所有对外操作由用户自行处理
---
## 质量约束
- 不得编造线索信息。找不到就说找不到。
- 不得声称线索说过或做过你未观察到的事情。
- 未经用户批准不得发送外联。
- 所有线索文件保持事实和专业——不要把推测当成事实。
- 仅使用公开信息。不要尝试访问私密主页、付费内容或需登录的页面。
- 如果对方的公开资料表明他们不希望被主动联系,将其标记为“不联系”并跳过。
- 轮换使用各个 Segment。不要反复只盯着一小群人。
- 保持外联的多样性——绝不能让连续两条消息给同一受众读起来像套模板。
---
## 错误恢复
- **调研结果稀少:** 在笔记中将线索标记为“需要更多调研”。下次会话换不同的搜索词再试。
- **外联无回复:** 第二次跟进仍无回复后,移入“休眠”子列表。不要删除——他们以后可能会互动。
- **收到负面回复:** 感谢对方,从活跃管线中移除,记录其偏好。不要争论或强推。
- **发现重复线索:** 合并文件,保留调研更完整的那一份,注明重复来源。
- **管线停滞不前:** 向用户如实汇报现状。建议新的 Segment 或切入角度。不要硬推外联。
---
## 每日流程示例
**用户:** “早上好——我们来推进一下线索吧。”
**你(内部流程):**
1. 读取 `/leads/daily-board.md` 和 `/leads/pipeline.md`
2. 汇报昨日结果:“昨天我们调研了开发者工具 Segment 的 3 条线索。其中 1 条通过筛选。周一发出的 2 条外联尚无回复。”
3. 今日管线健康度:“管线:4 个已发现、2 个已调研、3 个已筛选、2 个已联系、1 个培育中。已发现偏少——我来找 3 条新线索。”
4. 执行调研:搜索 Segment A 线索,找到 3 条,创建线索文件,加入管线
5. 调研最靠前的已发现线索:阅读其 GitHub、博客和 Twitter。撰写完整调研摘要。移入已调研。
6. 筛选一条已调研线索:“这位独立黑客刚发布了一款带文档站的开发工具。非常契合。通过筛选——优先级 高。”
7. 为最靠前的已筛选线索起草外联(由用户审阅并批准)
8. 将所有内容更新至 daily-board.md
9. 汇报总结:“今日:发现 3 条新线索,调研 1 条,筛选 1 条,起草 1 条外联。管线状态健康,活跃 12 条。明日:调研 2 条新发现的线索,并跟进周一那条已联系线索。”
---
## 文件输出规范
所有线索工作区文件均为 Markdown。遵循 `/skills/markdown-writer/SKILL.md` 规范。
关键约定:
- 用表格记录管线跟踪、外联日志和每日看板
- 用清单记录每日任务列表
- 在比较线索或 Segment 时,酌情使用分栏布局
- 单条线索文件保持整洁、易扫读
- pipeline.md 不得超过 200 行——每月将旧线索归档至 `/leads/archive/`相关资源
按类型、任务、场景与标签加权推荐
Mastra Factory
AI代理 · 工作流 · 开源框架 · TypeScript · LLM编排
Mastra 由 Gatsby 团队开发,是一个用于构建 AI 应用和代理的框架,它支持工作流、内存管理、流式处理、评估、追踪以及 Studio(一个用于开发和测试的交互式 UI)。
BrionetAI
AI代理 · 企业自动化 · 多模型编排 · 私有化部署 · 工作流引擎
将问题转化为互动式学习体验。你可以获取动画讲解、多语言语音旁白、AI 生成的模拟考试、自动生成的闪卡,以及个性化的分步学习路径。
Tuanjie AI
AI编程 · 代码生成 · 开发者工具 · 智能问答
AI赋能代码生成、调试、重构,智能代码索引与深度分析,支持VS Code/Visual Studio/JetBrains/Unity Tools,让游戏开发效率翻倍
Harden
AI代理 · 安全加固 · 完整性 · 开发工具 · 代码审查
Harden AIF 是一款免费的本地 AI 编码代理安全工具。它采用后训练模型,利用您的请求和会话上下文,在工具调用运行前对其进行检查。在关键的代理安全基准测试中,它超越了前沿模型,同时将您的代码库和工具输出保留在您的本地计算机上。
Web Search Agents by Nimble
web · search · real-time · data · AI · agent · scraping · structured
网络搜索代理是针对您特定领域(例如公司信息丰富、法规研究等)的专业网络爬虫和研究代理。它们会自主学习您的使用场景,深入挖掘对您最重要的资源,从而为您的 AI 提供更深入、更相关的网络上下文
Jolo — Your agents. One workspace.
AI代理 · 工作台 · 自动化 · 多智能体 · 协作
Jolo 是一款开源桌面应用程序和命令行界面 (CLI),用于与编码代理协作。它将 Claude Code、Codex、Devin、Gemini 和其他代理整合到一个工作区中,并包含聊天记录、文件、终端和浏览器